The prohibition of religious dress or symbols especially the headscarf has been a highly contentious question in the European Union for years. Both the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights’ approaches have been incisively and insightfully criticized for legitimizing a policy of neutrality and a ban on expression of religious or philosophical belief in the public sphere. This approach seems indeed difficult to reconcile with anti-discrimination law. While not as prominent a discussion in the US, the headscarf remains the target of Islamophobia and stereotyped claims that it represents the oppression of the women who wear them. In this context, it is striking that the perspectives of women which choose to wear the headscarf are rarely considered. The YLS European Law Association and the Harvard European Law Association have the great pleasure of hosting Prof. Eva Brems, Dr. Martijn van den Brink, Dr. Piela, Dr. Boubekeur and Prof. Whitman to unpack the contentious question of the prohibition of the headscarf in the public sphere from a comparative EU–US perspective.
Registration is required. Please register here.
Speakers: Prof. Eva Breems (Ghent University); Dr. Martinj van den Brink (Hertie School); Dr. Anna Piela (Northwestern University); Amel Boubekeur (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Ciences Sociales); Prof. James Q. Witham (Yale Law School).
Sponsors: RCC; Yale Law School; Harvard Law School; European Law Association.
LOCATION:ONLINE EVENT STATUS:CONFIRMED DTSTART:20220421T161000Z DTEND:20220421T173000Z END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR